An extraordinary
fireball over Quenngouck....in 1857 december27th !!!!
The true story of
Venus??
INDEX.
1 -
Venus birth.
2 -
Venus mythology.
3 - Velikovsky’s myth.
4 - The Great Amnesics.
5 - References.
1 - Venus birth.
Venus is not any more the mysterious planet of last
times. In 2004, after explorations of the Russian space probes then American,
one can say that it is the best studied
planet of our solar system. But I will
not output here tens of pages which the reader will easily find on the Web by
typing " the Venus planet " in Google ;I leave him the pleasure of
his discoveries.... It is by taking
again the process of laying planets by " nova " that I will more
logically explain the faults of our beautiful neighbor.
Venus seems well a twin sister of our Earth. Their dimensions are almost identical and the
nature and the density of the rocks are also very similar: they are basalts, volcanic rocks , forming
the surface of Venus crust that is covered with hundreds of thousands of hardly
extinct volcanos... Hence undoubtedly the extreme heat of its atmosphere: approximately 470°... These last hints are in favour of a laying of
globules of plasma composed of carbon monoxide which evolved as I’ve showed in
my book, but with a certain slowness inside our
hot neighbor. Let us pass
immediately to my theory of laying of planets by the explosive phenomenon
called NOVA. It is a current phenomenon
observed per tens in our galaxy and in close galaxies... I’ ve described its process
in my book and I request the reader to refer to it. Our Sun knew its first nova at the time of
the laying of the gas planets... Then it had the system that our astronomers discover today when they
find " exo-planets " orbiting
close to their mother-star... I present below an image which is more lisible(figure 1).
- Picture1 or first solar NOVA
Source http://www.seds.org/nineplanets/nineplanets/gif/soletal.gif
First of all I must specify that it is only a composed
image and that in reality the giant
planets are born naked, just like you or me;they will lay then their satellites
and will create their rings as I’ve already described ....All this is a natural and continuous process... All this of
more logical and more clear than the confused explanations given by official
astronomy. When second Nova explodes,
these planets are expelled towards the outside of the solar system and the
satellites already born also will undergo this shock wave, hence their
abnormal present rotation... Official
astronomy has NEVER presented a clear explanation to explain this fault....
Picture
2:our Sun just before its second NOVA....
Explanations :
The southern and twin under-core of Mars explodes and
expels MARS. The southern and twin under-core of the Earth
explodes
and expels our
Earth and VENUS. At the end of the nova,
there is
expulsion of MERCURY.
Picture 3 :our present solar system .(beyond
Pluto, it is the
field of the belt of Kuiper and, within nearly one
light-year, the
domain of Oorst.)-[ millions of asteroïdes ! ]
Source http://hebergement.ac-poitiers.fr/l-cc-angouleme/site_eleves/SnsCdrf/9plan.htm
(In the preceding site, you will find marvellous images of Venus and of
other planets :just click on the planet of your
choice !)
And everybody is
present now!!!.. Pluton is not a planet but the first satellite of
Neptune.....It has even the privilege to lay its small moon which is Charon...
The millions of meteorites which initially form the belt of Kuiper and the
domain of Oorst are only the vestiges of the millions of asteroids which
surrounded our Sun in its youthful state as"
planetary nebulae"... the shock waves of both novae push them
forwards to the borders of the present solar system.
Accretion has never existed... :this process exists
only on the level of the black holes of
the galaxies where fantastic energies clash... Anything of all that does not appear
around a young star or nebulae
planetary... The present Solar System
can only be explained by the explosive
phenomena of the novae confirmed by
the
observations.... To continue to affirm
that it is the "miraculous accretion " which generates planets
appears as a bad joke....But anything is
good to support the obviously
staggering theory
of Big-Bang !
Let us return to our Venus planet.
It has a
retrograde rotation, contrary to the
other solid planets... A simple glance on picture 2 shows us that it has kept
the
rotation which it
had within the solar mantle. We find the
same fault in gas planets with Uranus...This is an additional argument for two solar novae which would undoubtedly have occurred with
one or two billion years of interval under very similar conditions... I showed
in my book that the first planets are
gas planets because the globules of
plasma of the first nova were made of sodium... the second nova ejecting carbon
monoxide globules... All that is also in conformity with the observations...
Once more everything can be explained ...
Two important
points - 1:the absence of magnetism on
Vénus .It is
simply due to the
very weak axial rotation of this
planet; when
the axial rotation
of a core is high, one finds a high magnetic field or
gravitational
field and sometimes it is even intense as in pulsars or
the black holes...
Very very interesting !!!(see my diagram of the
gravitational
engine in my book !!!).
-2 :the millions of volcanos on
Venus prove,
after the discovery of the thousands of always active
volcanos on Io and
Triton, that the planets as well as the satellites
undergo a
significant volcanicity during almost all their existence.
The volcanos of the Moon and those of Mars are
not craters dug by
meteorites...
Where are those millions of meteors
which would have made these
ravages ??? I note that my assumption of the calefaction
and end of
calefaction, which
would be the cause of this volcanicity, is confirmed by
these
observations !!!
2- Venus Mythology.
Pict.. 4
Source
http://www.ac-orleans-tours.fr/lettres/coin_eleve/venus/venus/legende.htm
Among Greeks, she had been born from the scum of the floods, hence her name, Aphrodite, (Venus
among Romans),
after the mutilation of Ouranos by Cronos.
In another legend, she would have been born from the loves of Zeus( roman Jupiter) with Dione.. This second legend is
interesting because this birth would have been done out of the cranium of
Zeus(Jupiter ), as for Athena according to the legend which
follows. Zeus had put pregnant a mortal,
Metis, but, to avoid the anger of his wife to her, swallowed her mistress. A few times later, he felt atrocious
headaches . He called Hephaïstos(god of
fire) and asked him to split cranium to him.
The god blacksmith did it and out of the open cranium of Zeus appeared
Athena, very equipped in behaviour with warlike and already adult. Athena becomes Minerve among Romans... You said " Minerve
"? What comes to make this apparatus put around the neck to maintain the
head right? Traditionally, it was a white plaster sheath...
And it is here that we find an exceptional hint which shows us that these
legends are actually a coding of chemists... I ‘ll explain.... In a very old alchemical process, one takes a compound of gold and
of tin(symbolized by
Jupiter) which one treats by a particular solvent(Métis)
to obtain a particular
crystal which allows, by projection on a base metal, to transmute it
into gold... This
extraordinary crystal is formed after a 3 days cooking and increase in
heat to the 3 rd day( hence Héphaîstos); the compound forms a sublimated white substense in the collar of the bottle and
crystallizes at the bottom: it is Athéna who leaves, very armed, her
father’s cranium.... Very armed because
having immediately the property to
transmute the base metals... It is not the case for other stones obtained by other
processes; these last ones must undergo
an enrichment in gold called " fermentation "...But, you will think,
how can one pass from the religious field to the scientific field which is
chemistry? YOU must be aware that, since
the most remote times, the priests were the great " initiates " of
the mother of sciences or alchemy.
Berthelot, founder of the
organic chemistry in the 19 th century, has
made a very thorough study on the Greek and Arab alchemists... He especially quotes an old text which is
luminous for what I advance: "
Moreover, Olympiodore will write later ( 5th cent. A-C.)
" All the kingdom of Egypt, ô woman, is supported by three
arts: the art of the convenient
things; the art of nature and the art to treat the ores. It is art called divine, i.e. dogmatic art
for all those who deal with handling and with these honourable arts that one
calls four (arts the) chemical ones (this divine art) teaching what it is
necessary to do, was revealed with the priests alone... when a priest or what
one called wise, explained the things which he had received in heritage of his ancestors, ..., he did not communicate
it without reserve... In the same way
also... the craftsmen appointed with the operations made by the way of fire, as
those who had the knowledge of the washing of the ore and the continuation of
the operations, did not work for themselves, but were charged to increase the
royal treasures (...) .It
was a law among Egyptians that nobody would reveal these written things."
Berthelot " Collection, III " "
But what Berthelot does not say, it is that this secret knowledge was
revealed since the most remote
times in the form of legendary stories
(Homere: Iliade and Odyssea), or in symbolic systems of gods and goddesses...
The folklore(gold of the
people) of all the countries, since the oldest times, is carrying the
priceless secrecies of " crowned science " or alchemy, which is a
very old science but especially a very
coded science...I am not allowed to reveal some of the mysteries that I’ve
decoded after about thirty three years of research in alchemy... All that I
want to show is that it is a terrible
error to take these writings of our old for
an “astronomical " or " historical " code ... What Velikovsky did, as we will see in the following chapter.
3
–Velikovsky’s myth....
Velikovsky, psychiatrist of Russian origin, graduate of the university
of Moscow, of Edinburgh, former pupil of Henri Bergson, fellow traveller of
Einstein (they have founded the review Scripta Universitatis), emigrated in the
United States, published in 1950 a book which, since, does not cease making
waves: " Worlds in collision
". Presenting data resulting from
paleontology, Egyptology, Assyriology
and the Bible... it supported that our Earth had known, in a recent past,
planetary cataclysms:
- Venus arrival in the solar system, after its
ejection by Jupiter, towards 3000 B.C.
- near-collision of the Earth and Mars towards 1500
B.C.... all this accompanied with earthquakes and floods which would have been
transcribed by our ancestors
in the Bible when they speak, for example, of the
" 7 plagues of Egypt... " or when Plato describes the catastrophic
disappearance of Atlantis....
In short,he has
, by his writings, renewed a several centuries old theory :
Catastrophism.
However, he had precursors of whom he is without any
doubt inspired... In 1927 a German
Jesuit, Franz.X.Kugler, publishes already a remarkable book: " Sibillinischer Sterncampfund Phaethon
in naturgeschichtlicher Beleuchtung " or " the Sybilline battle of
stars and Phaeton... regarded as history authenticates " This scholar had
passed his life to decipher wedge-shaped writings and he deduces from them that
the assyrians and the babylonians transmitted to us important astronomical data
.He writes that a heavenly object that he calls " similar to the Sun
" is put into orbit around Venus towards 1500 B.C and
caused the catastrophes reported by the writings of this time (to confer Picture 5 below)....
Velikovsky, who had read the work of
Kugler (he quotes it in his bibliography) innovates by transforming this
association of a heavenly object with Venus by the expulsion of Venus out of
Jupiter and its wandering around Earth and Mars until 1500 before J.C. He translates
in this way certain passages of the Bible... I' ve shown in the previous chapter that he has
interpreted these writings in an erroneous way and that actually, the fabulous
Venus birth gave the coding of an alchemical process in which tin or Jupiter
was transformed into a quite as
fabulous crystal...(Venus...).
Nobody has, hitherto, emitted this
thesis....
In the beginning of the 20 th century, Hörbiger, a German pseudo-scientist,
had already published his book: "
The four moons " He has had a certain success in Germany and in Austria
until the beginning of the years 1930... His ideas became the " bible
" of Nazi scientific propaganda .
Its assumption based on the capture by the Earth of four successive moons during the geological
eras and their destruction progressively with their appearance did not have any
scientific base... Any reader eager to
know more will find other ideas
belonging to the catastrophic theories of this beginning of the 20th
century:Sirius... Dogons... etc... And a question comes to my mind :why all these theories have not
known this sudden blaze of criticisms and of passion Velikovsky’s book has known...??? We must think
that it happened in 1950, i.e. a little time after the famous observation of
Arnold and the quickly contradicted noise of the Roswell crash...in
1947.... American people was
getting more interested by this
phenomenon(ufology)... It was necessary to find a derivative... and it was the
Velikovsky pseudo-scandal, undoubtedly orchestrated without his knowledge by
some very high persons... And as the fish bites well one has made
the Velikovsky business last during nearly one half-century... " Velikovsky Myth "has made a marvelous work .A whole organization took
care that it could go on: an official
big armada versus a team of velikovskians well organized ... in short, the
made-to-order of the American sporting championships.... Astronomy has not gained
in all that mess and ufology even less... But, wasn't that the goal of
the operation???
Picture 5. Cataclysm and Mythology in Egypt....
.Sekhmet
Fire has burnt the countries of the 9th Circle...(Northen Europe).
Every thing has
been published about this affair except , of course, that Velikovsky has made
us take bladders for lanterns by presenting
Venus as expelled by Jupiter ,
whereas it was allegorical account
coding an alchemical process... It is a process of coding which was used by the
initiates during thousands of years....
I think that Velikovsky was aware of it
at one time of his research... Why had he persevered so much in the
catastrophism?
Another fact is worrying, it is the complete
silence he makes about the meteorites,
phenomenon largely discussed in the 19th century... My readers know how
admirably Flammarion
has developed of these " stones which fall from the sky "... And,
since his conclusion seems so difficult to swallow for all these Messrs of the official truth as
well as for Velikovsky and his supporters, I replace it again:
" Where do the aerolites come from? Their identity with the fireballs is not
doubtful any more since any fall of aerolite comes from a fireball. "
In the 19th century, every year,one or several
fireballs appear in the sky, pour in a thunderous noise a rain of meteorites,
then go away... And nobody do speak
about it in the 20th century... Don’t
you find that astonishing ???
And guess a little which is the book whose publication is announced
everywhere in France in 2003??? Just have a look on the left...
Yes, “The Book” has been translated into French!!!
But another book, thousand times more serious and
significant for astronomy, written in English, will not be translated into
French and published in France, it is the last book by Halton Arp that I ‘ve already presented in my
articles: " Seeing Red... "... Inquisition...has never been suppressed!!!!.
4 –The Great Amnesics: 
.
In connection with books, biographers
of Einstein tell that this last one, although very related to Velikovsky, has
always remained enough skeptic as for
the planetary theories by
Velikovsky... However, when he learns that his assumption on the Jupiter
magnetic field is confirmed by astronomers, he reads again " The worlds in
collision "... Eight days later, he dies... leaving this book open on his
bedside table.
It is there a beautiful story
which I quote especially to show that nothing is left on side by the medias to
tenderize the reader, or to better deceive him
.... The reader is free to buy what he wants, but if he wants to learn
more on the catastrophism, I recommend to him to consult :1-the book by
Flammarion which is given on the web( see " References " at the foot
of the page.)
2- a book extraordinarily more serious, written by a French
astronomer,and which, moreover, is published FREE on the Web....A part is translated in
English.
SITE DEVOTED TO THE NEO And THE IMPACTISM AND THE CATASTROPHISM
Picture 6 :Site
of Michel-Alain COMBES
LA MENACE
DU CIEL
Fig.6 :Site de Michel-Alain COMBES
LE SITE // LA TERRE BOMBARDÉE // L'AUTEUR
THE THREAT from the SKY....
Michel-Alain Combes offers a
priceless gift... I read and read again his extraordinarily rich and
enthralling articles; but I however will
make him a large reproach... In his chapter on the meteorites, not only one
word on the work of Flammarion. How such
a serious astronomer can literally gum the work quite as serious and worthy of
interest of another astronomer? It is
there a behavior which I cannot excuse....And this is why I see myself obliged,
with great regret, to classify Mr Combes among the skewer of the Great Amnesics
that I present in this article....
By listening on to the radio
(France culture), one Saturday afternoon of this December, I still heard the
magus of astronomy in France:Hubert Reeves(picture 7?)Source:
http://www.yfolire.net/sais/definition.php?code=systemso
[ clic right to have the
image! ]
Once more Mr Reeves made us travel
in the heart of his beautiful story of the Big-bang, but with a small point of
nostalgia in the voice. Some astronomers
allow themselves to doubt his beautiful story, which is an assumption and
which, like all the assumptions, is prone to be improved... No question of
giving it up . If some astronomers think of it, they are surely bad
astronomers... In short, follow my glance, they are similar to Halton Arp to
some extent. And, to add more weight to
his words, he quotes the example of the Pope Jean-Paul II. This last one would have declared one day
that the Big-bang is, undoubtedly , a supreme confirmation of the existence of
God. Poor Mr Reeves, to take the Pope
for a defender of astronomy... Jean-Paul II, at the time of one of his voyages in Poland, his native
land, is accomodated by all the Academy of Torun, beautiful citadel city
located on the Vistula The Rector
presents a letter to him asking for the discharge of Kopernik, condemned for his writings by
Papacy, more than 500 years ago...
What do you think that it occurred?
Never the Vice-chancellor obtained answer on behalf of the Pope!!! Never this last one intended to speak about Kopernik, without
any doubt... Again a great amnesic. Just like Hubert Reeves who has without any
doubt never heard about the meteorites
and the bolids by Flammarion... and even less of the transmutations with weak
energy by Kervran... (and of their confirmation by a fundamental experiment of
the C.N.R.S!) and even less about the
laying of the quasars by the galaxies observed with the telescope by Halton
Arp.... I think that all these great
Messrs suffer from a chromosomal disease that is difficult to be healed.... . Indeed, just like the super-powerful systems
that are the galaxies, our powerful PEOPLE must have in the center of their
brain a " black hole "...
HENCE their " lapseen of memory "... Every thing can be explained!!!
5 References:Just
for those who can manage with the French language!!!!
The site of the National
Library of France which allows the remote loading of old works. In the banner page, you click on "
Research "... then, in " author " you register " Flammarion
Camille " and in " subject " you put " astronomy " Click on " rechercher "
below ; in the posted list you take the n° 8 and click on the title...
You can read the admirable
book by Flammarion Camille: "
Popular Astronomy. General description
of the sky " Take page 686 and you will have the most beautiful pages of
this book: " Let us arrive now at
the fireballs and the aerolites.... ".
2-Again in the site of the
National Library, put simply the subject:
alchemy then click on " rechercher ";in the
list which is posted, I advise you:
- n°2: Introduction to the study of the chemistry of
the old times... by M.Berthelot.
- n°18: Origin of alchemy... by M.Berthelot.
- n°24: Alchemy and the
alchemists... by Louis Figuier.
3 -
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/chrysopee/somalc.htm
This site is of an incredible
richness , as well for the beginner in alchemy as for the senior researchers...
to consult with patience... quite a lot of patience....
Abscon. Christmas 2003. Joseph Glapa.
