Why is Earth getting worse and worse???

Because of a phenomenon never studied up to now:

The Maximum of Activity of a Planet...(MAP).

Astronomers know the Maximum of Activity in the Sun , that I shall call the “MAS”, but they do not see the succession of the various phases and ,moreover ,they seem to ignore everything of a similar phenomenon within our Planet , within any alive Planet....I shall call this last phenomenon the “ MAP “ or the Maximum of Activity in a Planet....But let us see at first what is going on in the Sun and the MAS will show us the different phases of the MAP...

Everybody knows what is the MAS , especially after the sun storms of these last years....The last ones happened at the beginning of 2003 and were very violent and marked the end of this MAS...

Any MAS is a cycle of 11 years approximately, a cycle observed since the 18^th century.It appears with dark spots on both parts of the sun.These spots are quite numerous at the peak of activity. At this phase ,the antagonistic baby-cores give a reverse magnetic field...(Please read my book about the different MAS I ‘ve described: 1891-1980-1990...).This phase ends two or three years later by a terrible jerk of matters mostly out of the poles...first the southern pole then the northern one.It’s the end of the MAS and the beginning of the MAP. That’s what we have observed at the beginning of 2003 :a big jerk out of the sun ...and the apparition of the famous El Nino in the Pacific Ocean.This present MAP will have a maximum of activity towards 2005-2006 ,with a jerk towards 2008-2009. I’ll describe it more at the end of this study....

I’ve deepened little this jerk phase in my book

....

This phenomenon would be due to a rupture of magnetic field and was known in the 19th century under the name ' ' the extra - current of rupture of magnétic field' '. It is, with the caléfactory explosion that gives a nova, the essential engine of the expulsion of planets...; in our Earth, it is quite the same process for the expulsion of a satellite. But on our globe, before leading to this extreme stage, it especially plays a role much more interesting in the genesis of the plates of the lithosphere in the northern hemisphere. Indeed, it seems to appear at the end of the period of maximum of activity of the baby cores, as for the sun.

Thus, in 1902, there are a series of earthquakes and volcanic explosions in the Antilles and in Central America (Bolivia). Everyone knows the horrible destiny of St Pierre during the explosion of the volcano of the Pelée mountain, in Martinique, in 1902. This paroxystic working life of the baby cores is completed in 1904 and the rupture of the reverse magnetic field created or Jerk will expel enormous quantities of lava by the médio-Atlantic break. This matter contribution will inevitably ' ' weigh' ' on the north-continental plates, in particular on the circumpolar areas which, in-depth, subside of one to several meters... It is a phenomenon known of the geophysicists and called ' ' isostasy ' '..., but the exact cause, that I have just given, was not cleared up... Thus in 1904, a surface of 400 km X 100km, in Canada, in the East of Terre Neuve, sank in one hour, of one to several meters into the Atlantic Ocean. This phenomenon is interesting because it enables us to explain the formation of the carboniferous layers, especially in the boreal continent, during the primary era..but also during the tertiary era, in China and on our premises in the Jura.

After each significant matter contribution in the circumpolar area, in the primary era,or carboniferous period, the neighbouring coasts subside and in fact successive stages, superimposed sometimes even well, are formed in steps.

Sands, mixed with salt or sodium chloride, hidden and overheated give birth, starting from Si(silicium) and Na, to carbon layers, by transmutation by weak energy of SI into Na then into NH4 and CH4 as I 've shown in my book. In China, during the tertiary era, these subsideses are very marked and this country has today an enormous layer of carboniferous Jurassic ,laying from the south-west to the North-East.

It is, I repeat it, the successive accumulation of matter in the form of lava at the edge of the rifts and oceanic breaks which weighs on the close plates and causes the depression of the coasts, it is called isostasy...

We know that the Eastern coast of current China borders three series of rifts and plates which clash in the East of Japan. They are thus primary and tertiary sandbeaches which give the carboniferous layers that we exploit today. Our minors walk on what were ' ' the Meds' clubs ' of the last eras! ....

An eruption of Etna...Source:Nasa(Etna bubbles)

But let us return to these successive matter contributions in the Northern hemisphere. They explain the reason why our sphere has most of the solid continents in the Northern hemisphere and immense Océans in the South especially. The moon presents the same aspect: the hidden face (Northern hemisphere) includes only mountains and no depressions in the form of ' ' seas' ', like the visible face or the Southern hemisphere.... Mars very recently, showed exactly the same mountainous structures in the Northern hemisphere and depressions or immense plates in the Southern hemisphere, with non-existent magnetic inversions in North where the lava was ejected during the rupture of magnetic field and hence does not carry the mark of an opposite magnetism.

In addition, it is by studying more closely this phenomenon called ' ' jerk' ' in our sun that I could put forth a very new assumption on the creation of the rings of giant gas planets: Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune.

In an article of the review ' ' La Recherche ' ' entitled ' ' the Rings of Planets ' ' of January 1986, vol17, p 40, Andre Brahic, astronomer and specialist in the small solar bodies presents these rings as remainders of the cloud of dust which would have formed, by accretion, the planets and some of their satellites... but this accretion has never been observed in space but always supposed! The Saturn's rings, the richest on the matter, appear like a' 'microgroove ' ' i.e. formed of thousands of furrows. For my part, this tenuity and this quantity suggest a creation much more logical. The giant planets are still alive , like the sun, or our Earth. They thus know the same phenomena as the latter: maximum of activity of baby- cores (even virtual since their existence does not appear at the present time)... and especially same ' ' jerks ' ' or explosions due to the ruptures of magnetic fields. Never as for our Earth, these phenomena were taken into account by the contemporary astronomers and geologists.

What a gap!

On giant planets,if the periods of maximum of activity are as frequent as on our premises (approximately every 11 years) each Jerk expels, especially in the Northern hemisphere, matter in gas form, therefore much lighter than our lava. At very high altitudes, this gas is ' ' captured' ' and ' ' evacuated' ' by tension fields of the magnetic field and escapes, the centrifugal force helping, to form rings. These periods of expulsion, since the birth of these planets, occurred thousands of times hence the aspect ' ' thin' ' and ' ' microgroove' ' of the Saturn's rings for example... These rings are not the remainders of a process ' ' of accrétion' ' : the limit of Roche, which would explain their formation (since within this limit the accretions are impossible!) is quite elastic when it is noted that the level E of the Saturn's rings possess satellites ! *

(* This expulsion seems to be observed by American astronomers in 2000, in the form of ' ' a "hat" of gas matter - above the Saturn North Pole! )

Saturn on the 11^th of november 2000

(www.astrosurf.com/simian/sys_sol_saturne.htm )

These rings are the result of cyclic gas matter expulsions,and these expulsions which are very well observed in the gas stars just like in our Sun.There are many stars equipped with rings of dust much more significant. They are called ' 'planetary nebulas ' ' because the official theory of accretion sees there the "nest" of future planets.

They are very young stars, extremely active,just like our sun at its birth. These rings are created by matter expulsions. They are not the remainders of ' ' a primitive nebula' '.

In our solar system, one finds the trace of these primitive star rings, far behind Neptune and his satellites. It is what is called the belt of Kuiper, located at - beyond Pluto and still further , at one year sunlight;then the space of OORST which would contain million asteroids that, in fact are the vestiges of the primitive ring of dust surrounding our sun after its birth and ejected by the latter whereas it was still ' ' a planetary nebula ' '.

This primitive ring distended until the current limits because of the two novae that upset our solar system to give , by planet layings, and not by accretion, its current face.

All that I have just exposed pleads in favour of another origin of these rings, as well planetary as stellar one....Formal astronomy explains NOTHING when speaking of "accretion"never observed but allways supposed ! It is not scientific....

This total silence which surrounds this phenomenon of ' ' jerk' ', with regard to our Earth ,is worrying. We know that the primary, secondary, tertiary eras knew great successive depressions of the plates in the Northern hemisphere. We know that during the quaternary, there were several transgressions or marine regressions after the great glaciation whose climax happened around -90.000 years approximately.

A first transgression appears around - 80.000 years ,then another towards - 40.000 years. It is towards - 7.000 years before J.-C. that the transgression known as ' ' flandrienne' 'took place. It is undoubtedly at that time that England was separated from the continent to become an island.

The activity of the volcano of Puy de Dôme, in France, would go up with - 10.000 years. It preceded by little that of the Killian crater that recovered it partially ; back to 8.300 years( carbon-14 analysis, (La Recherche:Avril 1986 p.498)

This agreement of activity between the volcanos of Mediterranean latitude and ' ' the transgressions ' ' in northen Europe make think of nowadays activities. It is known that the sea level has gone up of 100m for 12.000 years. This increase is not due primarily to the melting of the polar and circumpolar glaciers. The paroxystic activity of the baby - cores, every 11 years approximately, and its end in the form of ' ' Jerk ' ' or matter expulsion of which we have spoken, (as we 've seen for Canada and Terre Neuve) is the true cause of the last catastrophes. Thus , Iceland, primarily formed of lava was created ,and is always smoking.

In the Northern hemisphere, after the maximum of activity of the baby- cores in years 2005 -2006,the Jerk will occur towards 2007 -2008, and if the ejection of lava is significant on the circumpolar level of the Northern rift , there are strong chances that our coasts of Netherlands , Belgian and Flandrian are to collapse ! Just like at the primary era, a carboniferous era of successive depressions has already started, as we have just shown it. Towards 2007 - 2008, Holland may sink in one hour, as it was the case of the eastern Terre Neuve, in Canada, in 1904. And nobody, nobody among this scientific world to point out this obviousness or this strong probability!

It is true that we lived a so beautiful festival of the sun, in August 1999.!..And a “noble”

War at the beginning of 2003 “

Julius Ceasar has invented our modern world and he has got a great number of imitators....

In 4 or 5 years, joy will change into tears. Poor humanity!

In Abscon – May 2003.

HOME